Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03248
Original file (BC 2013 03248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:  				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03248
							COUNSEL: NONE
                       			HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  Her age waiver be approved and her Mandatory Separation Date 
(MSD) be extended.  

2.  She be reinstated and allowed to continue her military 
career in the Air Force Reserve until she qualifies for a 20-
year retirement.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

When she returned from a six-month deployment, she discovered 
she no longer held a position at her current Reserve unit due to 
her upcoming MSD and the over-manning in her career field.  She 
immediately initiated an age waiver request; however, it was not 
processed prior to her MSD; thereby, prompting her separation 
from the Air Force Reserve.  

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement; and, copies of Congressional Inquiry documentation, 
her request for retention, medical records, fitness 
documentation, and numerous electronic communications.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member in the Air Force Reserve who 
served as a Clinical Nurse, Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 
46N3.  She was progressively promoted to the grade of lieutenant 
colonel (O-5).  

The applicant was notified on 13 November 2011 that her MSD 
would expire on 30 November 2012 and, that in accordance with 
Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 14509, she was 
required to leave active status on the last day of the month in 
which she became 62 years of age.  However, in accordance with 
Title 10, USC, Section 14703, medical officers are eligible to 
apply for an extension to remain in an active status up to age 
68.  The standard timeline for initiating an extension request 
is at least six months before the member’s MSD; however, 
requests may be submitted no earlier than one year prior to the 
MSD expiration.  

The applicant’s request for an age waiver to extend her MSD was 
received on 5 November 2012.  Due to the overage of Clinical 
Nurses at the applicant’s unit, AFRC/SG could not recommend 
approval of her request.  On 14 November 2012, AFRC/SG 
recommended the applicant be assigned to a unit with manning 
positions available and, that she apply through her new chain of 
command for a MSD waiver.  However, a waiver request from her 
new chain of command was not received prior to her MSD.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFRC/SG recommends denial.  SG indicates that manning for 
Clinical Nurses in the Air Force Reserve is at 107 percent.  The 
applicant’s AFSC is not a critical wartime healthcare specialty 
with critical shortages per Assistant Secretary of Defense 
Memorandum, dated 12 July 2011, Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Reserve 
Component Wartime Health Care Specialties with Critical 
Shortages.  

The applicant was not reassigned to a valid vacant position in 
an undermanned unit until a few days prior to her MSD.  She was 
advised that her request for an MSD extension had to be staffed 
through her new chain of command.  However, no additional 
documents were received from the applicant or her unit.  Her 
discharge order, dated 3 January 2013, reflects her date of 
separation as 30 November 2012.  

The complete SG evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

__________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 January 2013 for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response.

__________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Additionally, she has not provided evidence to show she was 
treated differently from other similarly situated members.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-03248 in Executive Session on 10 April 2014, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                       , Panel Chair
	                       , Member
	                       , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03248:

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 Jul 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFRC/SG, dated 12 Sep 13.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14. 




								                    
								Panel Chair


6


3


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02836

    Original file (BC 2013 02836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant requested an extension to her MSD to allow her the opportunity to complete 20 years of satisfactory service for retirement. In this respect, we note the applicant timely requested an extension of her 31 Dec 12 MSD in Mar 12;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05117

    Original file (BC 2013 05117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, there was the sense at the time that allowing the applicant to remain in the AFRC/SG2 position would block other 41As from career progression into that position. A complete copy of the AFRC/SG evaluation is at Exhibit C. SAF/MRBP recommends denial of the applicant’s request for an MSD extension and/or reinstatement, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800704

    Original file (9800704.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Because of the manning shortage of clinical nurses in the AFRes at that time, individuals with an Associate Degree in Nursing were entitled to a stipend under the Air Force Ready Reserve Stipend Program (AFRRSP) to pursue a Baccalaureate Degree in Nursing (BSN). Applying this argument to the stipend program generally would place an obligation on the Air Force to personally notify each affected officer prior to removing a specialty from the list of critical specialties. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03908

    Original file (BC-2008-03908.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) of 31 October 2008 be extended six months to allow adequate time to process a request for an MSD extension through Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) channels to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for a final determination. In October 2007, the applicant was notified by certified letter of the requirements for requesting an MSD extension. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03160

    Original file (BC-2010-03160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 August 2009, the applicant requested an MSD waiver through the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR). On 9 April 2010, the AFBCMR granted her MSD waiver to 9 August 2010 to process her extension request through her chain of command. SG2 states it does not appear appropriate for the AFBCMR to extend the applicant’s MSD a second time without the complete coordination of her chain of command and the recommendation from the AFRC/CC.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900099

    Original file (9900099.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a letter from HQ Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) requesting award of AFSC 46PX, dated XX Nov 98; his certification as a psychiatric and mental health nurse by the American Nurses Credentialing Center from X Sep 94 to XX Aug 99; and a message from AFRC, dated XX Oct 98 (Exhibit A). While the applicant may have performed duties as a mental health nurse, he never possessed that AFSC during any of the promotion boards that considered him. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019183

    Original file (20130019183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum published by NGB on 26 September 2012, Subject: Announcement of Approved Exception to Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1205.21, RC Incentives Program Procedures, paragraph 5b states PAs are eligible for Special Pay Bonus in the amount of $15,000 per year. She signed another contract for the Special Pay Bonus for $20,000 per year and then another contract for $15,000 per year. The applicant was not eligible to contract for the incentive until the ETP list was approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02344

    Original file (BC-2011-02344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Examiners note: According to the governing SAF/AA policy letter dated 8 December 2006, (Exhibit B) entitlement to medical continuation orders begins when the condition renders the member unable to perform military duty not when the injury occurred or when the airman was released from active duty. The applicant was not continued on active duty or placed on medical continuation orders until 16 June 2011 after completion of the LOD determination. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05840

    Original file (BC 2013 05840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05840 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 11, Primary Specialty, reflect M46A3, Medical Service Specialty, Nursing Administrator, 8 years; M46S3, Medical Service Specialty, Operating Room Nurse, 17 years; and 46N3, Clinical Nurse, 3 years. An officer’s DAFSC must match an awarded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02818

    Original file (BC-2006-02818.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members of the Board Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr., and Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty considered this application on 15 November 2006. B. J. WHITE-OLSON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFRC/SG, dtd 16 Oct 06 AFBCMR BC-2006-02818 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...